Stop Centennial Dam
A 19th Century Approach
to a 21st Century Problem
to a 21st Century Problem
Centennial Dam in the News
|
https://www.theunion.com/news/state-funding-unlikely-for-centennial-dam/
State funding unlikely for Centennial Dam? By Matthew Pera February 2, 2018 |
http://www.auburnjournal.com/article/1/20/18/another-view-centennial-dam-self-combustible-nid
Another View: Centennial Dam is a self-combustible for NID By Jack Sanchez January 20, 2018 |
https://www.theunion.com/opinion/darrell-berkheimer-why-nid-actions-are-drawing-such-unusual-attention/
Why NID actions are drawing such unusual attention By Darrell Berkheimer January 19, 2018 |
|
http://www.auburnjournal.com/article/1/17/18/another-view-nid-moving-too-quickly-plans-centennial-dam
Another View: NID is moving too quickly on plans for Centennial Dam By Michael Tritel January 17, 2018 |
https://www.theunion.com/opinion/columns/bruce-herring-the-future-priorities-of-nid/
The future priorities of NID By Bruce Herring January 10, 2018 |
https://www.theunion.com/opinion/columns/peter-van-zant-what-is-the-cost-of-centennial-dam-and-who-pays/
What is the cost of Centennial Dam? And who pays? By Peter Van Zant December 22, 2017 |
NID Releases Centennial Costs to Date
www.theunion.com/news/nid-breaks-down-money-spent-on-proposed-centennial-dam-project/
www.theunion.com/news/nid-breaks-down-money-spent-on-proposed-centennial-dam-project/
|
Excerpt: "Nevada Irrigation District has spent just over $11.3 million to date on its proposed Centennial Reservoir project along the Bear River, Project Manager Doug Roderick said Wednesday. "...the district has so far purchased 25 properties — eight of which include homes — near the Bear River in preparation for the reservoir project. The district has spent $5,455,519 on property acquisitions, he said. "NID has also spent money on engineering and real estate consultants, staff time and legal fees related to the Centennial project..." |
Recent Letters to the Editor - Keep up the pressure!
(more to come)
(more to come)
|
yubanet.com/regional/peter-van-zant-be-skeptical-of-nid-scare-tactics/
July 26, 2017 Be Skeptical of NID Scare Tactics By Peter Van Zant |
www.auburnjournal.com/article/7/19/17/reader-input-no-centennial-dam-%E2%80%94-save-bear-river
July 20, 2017 No to Centennial Dam — Save Bear River By Lucy Clark, Auburn |
www.theunion.com/opinion/columns/bob-branstrom-more-than-transparency/
July 16, 2017 More than Transparency By Bob Branstrom, Grass Valley |
|
www.auburnjournal.com/article/7/03/17/tip-nid-iceberg
July 4, 2017 Tip of the NID Iceberg By Dianna Suarez, Colfax www.auburnjournal.com/article/7/26/17/law-enforcement-support-bear-river-park-appreciated July 26, 2017 Law Enforcement Support for Bear River Park Appreciated By Dianna Suarez, Colfax |
www.auburnjournal.com/article/5/30/17/nid-should-wait-study
May 31, 2017 NID Should Wait for Study By: Ricki Heck, Grass Valley |
|
Demand Transparency
from NID! |
|
Videos ONLINE
Centennial Dam Watchdog Activist Summit
League of Women Voters Presents: "Centennial Dam & Regional Water Resources"
How a New Dam on the Bear River Threatens Native American's Living Culture
Centennial Dam FAQ
(Download PDF)
|
|
HELP SAVE BEAR RIVER NOW!
Your support is needed today to stop Centennial Dam. 10,000 Thanks!
NOTE: Your donation goes to American River Watershed Institute (a 501 c3 non-profit organization) and can be tax-deductible (consult your financial advisor).
More News and Information coming soon...
If you attended any NID board meetings or presentations, we would appreciate getting notes and recordings to help inform the concerned community about the Centennial Dam project as the process moves forward. Please contact our webmaster (email link) if you have anything to add to our records.
Thank you!
If you attended any NID board meetings or presentations, we would appreciate getting notes and recordings to help inform the concerned community about the Centennial Dam project as the process moves forward. Please contact our webmaster (email link) if you have anything to add to our records.
Thank you!
Comments submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board protesting NID's application for water rights for Centennial Dam:
- Comments submitted by Foothills Water Network - DOWNLOAD PDF
- Comments submitted by American River Watershed Institute - DOWNLOAD PDF
Nevada Irrigation District (NID) is proposing this dam as a solution to climate change, a very bad idea. This dam idea was first proposed in 1926, was rejected again in 1960. It is a 19th century idea proposed for a 21st century problem. It won’t work.
Thanks for ALL the incredible comment letters people sent to NID about the Centennial Project - the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) will have to address each of the concerns voiced in over 300 submittals!
Click Image to Read Article Online
<- Foothills Water Network Responds to NID DOWNLOAD PDF
American River Watershed Institute Responds to NID
DOWNLOAD PDF
Conservation Groups Question Need for Centennial Dam
Cite significant impacts on Bear and Yuba Rivers in comment letter to NID
Nevada City, CA – The Foothills Water Network, a coalition of conservation and recreation organizations, submitted a joint letter to the Nevada Irrigation District (NID) today stating its concerns that the proposed Centennial Dam will have significant environmental impacts on the Bear and Yuba River watersheds and surrounding communities.
The water agency’s proposal to build a new 110,000 acre-foot reservoir with a 275 foot-tall dam on the Bear River would inundate six miles of the Bear River, completely flooding the Bear Campground, more than 25 homes and 120 parcels, and Dog Bar Bridge, the only crossing of the Bear River between Highway 49 and Highway 174.
In its letter to NID, the Network asked NID to describe how its $300 million project would actually operate to meet a long list of stated goals. “Many of the goals appear contradictory, especially the one that proposes to benefit the Delta by diverting more water,” said Chris Shutes of the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance. The Network suggested a range of alternative actions for NID to consider such as repairing or modifying its aging facilities, improving canal efficiency, incentivizing water conservation, stopping leaks, and metering water.
“Dams are an example of 19th century thinking,” said Otis Wollan, President of the American River Watershed Institute and a former Placer County Water Agency Boardmember. “Rather than build a controversial and expensive new dam, this is an historic opportunity for NID to demonstrate how it could meets its needs through increased conservation and efficiency.”
Since nearly half of the South and Middle Yuba River water already gets diverted to the Bear River, the South Yuba River Citizens League (SYRCL) is concerned that Centennial could demand even more water.
“In a time of record drought and climate change, we need creative, environmentally sustainable solutions such as recharging the groundwater, and restoring meadows, wetlands, and floodplains,” said Caleb Dardick, SYRCL’s Executive Director.
The proposed dam site would completely inundate several sacred Native American sites as well as sites popular with the local community who swim, hike and fish this section of the Bear River.
"The Bear River serves as a territorial divide for three different Nisenan Tribal entities. We are extremely concerned about NID's plans to flood this cultural landscape that contains spiritual and ceremonial sites that are still used by Nisenan people today as they have been for countless generations,” said Shelly Covert, Secretary and Spokesperson, Nevada City Rancheria Tribal Council.
“The proposed Centennial Dam will in effect create a twenty mile long reservoir, drowning the last stretch of irreplaceable, beautiful flowing river and oak woodland available to the public,” said Allan Eberhart of the Sierra Club’s Mother Lode Chapter.
The Network’s letter expressed concern about the dam’s growth-inducing impact in the region. Rather than provide for current NID residential customers, most of whom live at an elevation 1,000 feet higher than the dam site and won’t be served by it, the new water storage may instead facilitate more residential sprawl including as many as 12,000 new homes in Lincoln alone.
"Sierra Watch already helped to stop one bad dam on the Bear River. Now the Foothills Water Network and SYRCL are asking the tough questions about another, and we're proud to stand with them," said Tom Mooers, Executive Director of Sierra Watch, a group that has challenged land-use developments in the Sierra including Garden Bar Dam.
The Centennial Dam proposal has alarmed community members throughout the Bear and Yuba watersheds. Nearly 400 people attended two public scoping meetings about the proposal on March 9th and 10th. Dozens of speakers expressed their concerns about the project’s potential impacts on the environment and surrounding community.
About the Foothills Water Network:
The Foothills Water Network represents a broad group of non-governmental organizations and water resource stakeholders in the Yuba River, Bear River, and American River watersheds. The overall goal of the Foothills Water Network is to provide a forum that increases the effectiveness of non-profit conservation organizations to achieve river and watershed restoration and protection benefits for the Yuba, Bear, and American rivers.
NID material from scoping meetings (March 9 & 10 in Nevada County): NID Presentation • Transcript of Comments
Nevada Irrigation District Contact:
Lisa Francis Tassone, Board Secretary, Nevada Irrigation District
1036 W.Main Street, Grass Valley, CA 95945
Phone: 530-273-6185 ext.2221 Fax: 530-477-2646 Email: tassone@nidwater.com
Follow Us